<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Enumclaw Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com</link>
	<description>Wills &#124; Trusts &#124; Estates Law from Enumclaw, Washington</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Update on FORM 17:  make sure and read the statute!</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/real-property/update-on-form-17-make-sure-and-read-the-statute/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/real-property/update-on-form-17-make-sure-and-read-the-statute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington&#8217;s Form 17 forms have  additions to them (like a carbon monoxide detector disclosure).  Here are the statutes (read them before you pull forms off any old website (including this one)! Commerical: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=64.06.013 Residential (unimproved): http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=64.06.015 Residential (improved): http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=64.06.020]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/real-property/update-on-form-17-make-sure-and-read-the-statute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What They&#8217;re Saying About Asset Protection Trusts</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/saying-asset-protection-trusts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/saying-asset-protection-trusts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor/Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week there was a fairly in-depth colloquy between Oregon trust and estate attorneys that was broadcasted on the Oregon Bar Association&#8217;s listserv.  Below is a selection of the various comments &#8211; unattributed. First, the question from John Doe &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/saying-asset-protection-trusts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/saying-asset-protection-trusts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Supreme Court comes down on MERS</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/washington-supreme-court-comes-mers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/washington-supreme-court-comes-mers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debtor/Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate Deeds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday the Washington Supreme Court issued its case in  the Certified Question of Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage. Here&#8217;s the Opinion. The primary issue before the court was whether MERS can be a lawful beneficiary on a deed of trust, with &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/washington-supreme-court-comes-mers/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/washington-supreme-court-comes-mers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oregon Court of Appeals Rules Against MERS in foreclosure cases</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/oregon-court-appeals-rules-mers-foreclosure-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/oregon-court-appeals-rules-mers-foreclosure-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debtor/Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the opinion in Niday v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC.  Washington&#8217;s version of this case, Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage, MERS, et al. is pending with the Washington Supreme Court. We&#8217;ll post it when it comes out.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/debtor-creditor/oregon-court-appeals-rules-mers-foreclosure-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bingo! (sues Hazelrigg)</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/bingo-sues-hazelrigg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/bingo-sues-hazelrigg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debtor/Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hazelrigg Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[involuntary bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bingo Investments, run by the Bingham family (who are married into the Fisher family) (read this article for background) are suing Tom Hazelrigg III, asking the Court to deny Hazelrigg a discharge of his debt.  The alleged basis for the &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/bingo-sues-hazelrigg/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/bingo-sues-hazelrigg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Josh Powell Life Insurance Update</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probate-litigation/josh-powell-life-insurance-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probate-litigation/josh-powell-life-insurance-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Josh Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Cox Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpleader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Powell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last.  New York Life has filed a motion to dismiss itself from the case, leaving the Coxes and Powell to duke it out in federal court. Without taking a position either way, New York Life&#8217;s motion surveys the facts &#8211; who &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/probate-litigation/josh-powell-life-insurance-update/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probate-litigation/josh-powell-life-insurance-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can They Take My Retirement? Basic Asset Protection Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/can-take-retirement-basic-asset-protection-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/can-take-retirement-basic-asset-protection-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asset Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor/Creditor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over  time we accumulate assets. We borrow money to buy a home and repay it.  The home usually appreciates in value (except for recently). Some of  us buy CDs or stocks, bonds, and life insurance. Or we contribute to an  &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/can-take-retirement-basic-asset-protection-explained/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/can-take-retirement-basic-asset-protection-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curious Result in Life Insurance Interpleader Case</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/uncategorized/curious-result-life-insurance-interpleader-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/uncategorized/curious-result-life-insurance-interpleader-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US District Court recently dismissed a $1 million life insurance interpleader case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.  The case is Transamerica Life Insurance Co. v. Marie, et al.  The result is curious, and if legally correct, virtually eliminates &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/uncategorized/curious-result-life-insurance-interpleader-case/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/uncategorized/curious-result-life-insurance-interpleader-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Estate Tax Exemption Continues as Guessing Game</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/federal-estate-tax-exemption-continues-guessing-game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/federal-estate-tax-exemption-continues-guessing-game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 22:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Get ready because estate taxes are about to change. Again. Perhaps dramatically. Over  the years, federal estate tax exemptions have consistently been  inconsistent. In 2001 for example, the exemption was $675,000 – meaning  that every dollar more than $675,000 inherited &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/federal-estate-tax-exemption-continues-guessing-game/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/estates/federal-estate-tax-exemption-continues-guessing-game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caselaw Update: Court Addresses Undue Influence in Estate of Melter</title>
		<link>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probates/caselaw-update-court-addresses-undue-influence-estate-melter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probates/caselaw-update-court-addresses-undue-influence-estate-melter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Owen Gabrielson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Probate Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Probate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington State]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.enumclawproject.com/?p=743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Estate of Melter, 167 Wn. App. 285, 273 P.3d 991 (2012) is an interesting case, well authored by both the majority, and the separate concurrence.  It&#8217;s a must read for Washington trust and estate lawyers.  We think it is important &#8230; <a href="http://www.enumclawproject.com/probates/caselaw-update-court-addresses-undue-influence-estate-melter/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.enumclawproject.com/probates/caselaw-update-court-addresses-undue-influence-estate-melter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
